Home/ Questions/Q 8100167
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-06-05T22:40:24+00:00

While looking through some old code I came across this gem: MyObject o =

  • 0

While looking through some old code I came across this gem:

MyObject o = new MyObject("parameter");
if (o == null) o = new MyObject("fallback parameter");

The second line is marked in Eclipse as dead code, and I understand why. No exception seems to be explicitly thrown, and it isn’t possible for the MyObject constructor to throw any kind of exception (such as NullPointerExceptions).

My question is why there is a null check? Was it previously possible in an old version of Java for a constructor to return null? Or is this simply useless and dead code?

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    The code is dead in any version of Java. It’s not possible for a constructor to return null, and even if an exception would be thrown from the constructor, the next line won’t be called.

    • 0