Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6647853
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T00:35:11+00:00 2026-05-26T00:35:11+00:00

While reverse engineering I came around a very odd program that uses a calling

  • 0

While reverse engineering I came around a very odd program that uses a calling convention that passes one argument in eax ( very odd compiler ?? ). I want to call that function now and I don’t know how to declare it, IDA defines it as

bool __usercall foo<ax>(int param1<eax>, int param2);

where param1 is passed in the eax register. I tried something like

bool MyFoo(int param1, int param2) 
{
    __asm mov eax, param1;
    return  reinterpret_cast<bool(__stdcall *)(int)>(g_FooAddress)(param2);
}

However, unfortunately my compiler makes use of the eax register when pushing param2 on the stack, is there any way how I can make this clean without writing the whole call with inline assembler? (I am using Visual Studio if that matters)

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T00:35:12+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 12:35 am

    There are “normal” calling conventions which pass arguments via registers. If you are using MSVC for example, __fastcall.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86_calling_conventions#fastcall

    You cannot define your own calling conventions, but I would suggest that you do create a wrapper function which does its own calling / cleanup via inline assembly. This is probably the most practical to achieve this effect, though you could also probably do it faster by using __fastcall, doing a bit of register swapping, then jmp to the correct function.

    There’s more to a calling convention than argument passing though, so option #1 is probably the best as you’ll get full control over how the caller acts.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

This article says that Emacs has redo because you can reverse direction while undoing,
I've been working on a django project for a while now that uses grappelli
While creating a file synchronization program in C# I tried to make a method
I was thinking about a tool to inspect objects at runtime, primarily for reverse-engineering
This a code that would reverse the data of a document and save it
can any one give me the dry output for this program? #include <stdio.h> main()
I've been tasked with reverse engineering Hibernate mappings from a large, legacy, sql server
I have a String and want to reverse it so that some characters get
Error: Caught NoReverseMatch while rendering: Reverse for 'archive' with arguments '()' and keyword arguments
While the C# spec does include a pre-processor and basic directives (#define, #if, etc),

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.