Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3610774
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 18, 20262026-05-18T21:47:38+00:00 2026-05-18T21:47:38+00:00

Whilst poking around some code using a .NET Reflector for an app I don’t

  • 0

Whilst poking around some code using a .NET Reflector for an app I don’t have the source code for, I found this:

if (DeleteDisks)
{
  using (List<XenRef<VDI>>.Enumerator enumerator3 = list.GetEnumerator())
  {
    MethodInvoker invoker2 = null;
    XenRef<VDI> vdiRef;
    while (enumerator3.MoveNext())
    {
      vdiRef = enumerator3.Current;
      if (invoker2 == null)
      {
        //
        // Why do this?
        //
        invoker2 = delegate {
          VDI.destroy(session, vdiRef.opaque_ref);
        };
      }
      bestEffort(ref caught, invoker2);
    }
  }
}
if (caught != null)
{
  throw caught;
}


private static void bestEffort(ref Exception caught, MethodInvoker func)
{
  try
  {
    func();
  }
  catch (Exception exception)
  {
    log.Error(exception, exception);
    if (caught == null)
    {
      caught = exception;
    }
  }
}

Why not call VDI.destroy() directly? Is this just a way of wrapping the same pattern of try { do something } catch { log error } if it’s used a lot?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-18T21:47:38+00:00Added an answer on May 18, 2026 at 9:47 pm

    The reason appears to be to have a single function for handling and logging errors in operations that can fail: bestEffort. The delegate is used to wrap the action which can fail and pass it to the bestEffort function.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Whilst refactoring some legacy C++ code I found that I could potentially remove some
Whilst analysing some legacy code with FXCop, it occurred to me is it really
Whilst refactoring some old code I realised that a particular header file was full
Whilst refactoring some code I came across some getter methods that returns a std::string.
Whilst trawling through some old code I came across something similar to the following:
Whilst trying to get our app working in Firefox (I'm a big proponent of
Whilst starting to learn lisp, I've come across the term tail-recursive . What does
Whilst working on a recent project, I was visited by a customer QA representitive,
Whilst investigating a memory leak I discovered that it was caused by calling NewRow()
Is there a way to utilise the GCC compiler whilst still being able to

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.