Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 110351
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T02:12:48+00:00 2026-05-11T02:12:48+00:00

Why are ‘me’ and ‘this’ undefined when setTimeout calls it’s anonymous callback? var gMyObj

  • 0

Why are ‘me’ and ‘this’ undefined when setTimeout calls it’s anonymous callback?

    var gMyObj = new MyObj();     gMyObj.myFunc();      function MyObj() {         this.myFunc = function () {             var me = this;             alert(me.constructor);  // defined             setTimeout(function(me) {                         alert(me.constructor); // undefined                   }, 100);         };     } 

Resolution: The selected answer is correct, thank you. My question was a simplification of the real problem I was having, which turned out to be the way jQuery modifies ‘this’ inside the click() method so that it points to the relevant DOM element. I had created a new var, ‘me’, to hold onto ‘this’, and was trying to pass it in to the click method. All I needed to do was just use ‘me’ inside the click event, and let the closure keep a reference to it. Passing ‘me’ into click() failed, for the same reason that it failed in this example, namely, click() was not expecting it.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T02:12:48+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 2:12 am

    Because of this:

    function(me) {  

    Make it:

    function() { 

    And you’re good to go.

    As to the ‘why?’ part, you are defining an anonymous function that takes an argument called me. When setTimeout() calls that function, it passes no arguments, meaning me will be undefined. Removing me from the argument list allows the previously defined me to be visible within the function.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 114k
  • Answers 114k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer do { // whatever } while ( !condition ); May 11, 2026 at 10:16 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You could create your own dialect class by subclassing FirebirdDialect… May 11, 2026 at 10:16 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer java.lang.System.getProperty("os.arch") should help -- giving "arm", "amd64", and the like. May 11, 2026 at 10:16 pm

Related Questions

Why are the British confused about us calling bread rolls “biscuits” when they call bread rolls “puddings”?
Why are SQL distributions so non-standard despite an ANSI standard existing for SQL? Are
Why are pointers such a leading factor of confusion for many new, and even
Why are unsigned integers not CLS compliant? I am starting to think the type
Why are 'out' parameters in .NET a bad idea? I was recently asked this,

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.