Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6779687
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T16:24:55+00:00 2026-05-26T16:24:55+00:00

Why can’t a volatile object call a non- volatile member function? In case of

  • 0

Why can’t a volatile object call a non-volatile member function?

In case of const, it makes sense that calling a non-const member function violates the constness of the the object and hence it is prohibited. But why in the case of volatile?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T16:24:56+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 4:24 pm

    In case of const, it makes sense that calling a non-const member function violates the const-ness of the the object and hence it is prohibited. But why in the case of volatile?

    It’s just the same for volatile. Volatile means every access to an object is a visible side effect and cannot be eliminated. If you called a nonvolatile method on a volatile object, you would violate this property (because the nonvolatile method would treat the object just as a normal object). Therefore, it is impossible.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Can I call select before recv_from on a socket that is blocking?
Can somebody point me to a resource that explains how to go about having
Can a LINQ enabled app run on a machine that only has the .NET
Can I call a java class method from inside a flash movie?
Can I have a project that has some parts written in c and other
Can some one confirm me that only one UIWindow instance is possible in any
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an ’ in it. SimpleXML turns this
can you show me how to assign css properties to the button that is
Can we do following in SQL Server 2005 query with convert function. MaxRegID =
Can you set the internal [[Class]] property of an ECMAScript object?

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.