Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6475793
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 25, 20262026-05-25T06:44:51+00:00 2026-05-25T06:44:51+00:00

Why do some people prefer to use .setCommandListener(this) over .setCommandListener(new CommandListener(){}) more often? In

  • 0

Why do some people prefer to use

.setCommandListener(this)

over

.setCommandListener(new CommandListener(){})

more often? In what case should I use the second one and why?
I am assuming it’s just a matter of style or is there a particular issue?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-25T06:44:52+00:00Added an answer on May 25, 2026 at 6:44 am

    If you use “this”, you must implement the listener to the class, and then you can access fields of class in the implemented methods of listener.

    If you use the second one(new Listener…) then it might be more readable code if you don’t need to access many other stuff in your class.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Some people have suggested that when doing an estimate one should make a lower
I have seen some people who refuse to use Interface Builder and prefer to
In a coding style question about infinite loops , some people mentioned they prefer
I know of some people who use git pull --rebase by default and others
I normally use ; to combine more than one command in a line, but
EDIT: 1. Let's not make this a general vim/emacs debate. I know some people
Some people don't like sequences on Oracle. Why? I think they are very easy
Some people want to see the DB structure and dont have VS, is there
It seems obvious that some people have been able to figure out how to
I'm hearing that some people believe storing info on the server in a session

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.