Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 167461
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T12:16:46+00:00 2026-05-11T12:16:46+00:00

Why does C/C++ differentiate in case of an array index out of bound? #include

  • 0

Why does C/C++ differentiate in case of an array index out of bound?

#include <stdio.h>  int main() {     int a[10];     a[3] = 4;     a[11] = 3; // Does not give a segmentation fault     a[25] = 4; // Does not give a segmentation fault     a[20000] = 3; // Gives a segmentation fault     return 0; } 

I understand that it’s trying to access memory allocated to a process or a thread in case of a[11] or a[25] and it’s going out of stack bounds in case of a[20000].

Why doesn’t the compiler or linker give an error? Aren’t they aware of the array size? If not, then how does sizeof(a) work correctly?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T12:16:46+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 12:16 pm

    The problem is that C/C++ doesn’t actually do any boundary checking with regards to arrays. It depends on the OS to ensure that you are accessing valid memory.

    In this particular case, you are declaring a stack based array. Depending upon the particular implementation, accessing outside the bounds of the array will simply access another part of the already allocated stack space (most OS’s and threads reserve a certain portion of memory for stack). As long as you just happen to be playing around in the pre-allocated stack space, everything will not crash (note i did not say work).

    What’s happening on the last line is that you have now accessed beyond the part of memory that is allocated for the stack. As a result you are indexing into a part of memory that is not allocated to your process or is allocated in a read only fashion. The OS sees this and sends a seg fault to the process.

    This is one of the reasons that C/C++ is so dangerous when it comes to boundary checking.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

The term test case used a lot, but what does it actually mean? Test
I realise that FileSystemWatcher does not provide a Move event, instead it will generate
how to differentiate the 480X800 and 480X854 screens. we have an option to put
I've had a hard time finding references in the TR1 documentation concerning shared arrays.
I have a Flex3 application which has to be capable of uploading multiple files
I read somewhere (can't find it now) that large exception hierarchies are a waste
I am using the actionSheet variable passed by actionSheet:didDismissWithButtonIndex: to compare the calling actionSheet
MVC encourages RESTful URL's, yet HTML forms by nature append the data in query
I am fighting with a very strange javascript behavior on a jQuery UI widget

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.