Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4341606
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 21, 20262026-05-21T11:30:27+00:00 2026-05-21T11:30:27+00:00

Why does this fail to compile with GCC 4.4? template<typename T> class A {

  • 0

Why does this fail to compile with GCC 4.4?

template<typename T>
class A {
public:
    void foo () {

    }

private:
    T x;
};

namespace Ns {
template<typename T>
void do_it (A<T> a) {
    a.foo ();
}
};

template<typename T>
void myfun (T x) {
    Ns::do_it (x);
}

template<typename T>
class B {
public:
    void bar () {

    }

private:
    T x;
};

namespace Ns {
template<typename T>
void do_it (B<T> b) {
    b.bar ();
}
};

int main () {
    A<int> a;
    B<int> b;

    myfun (a);
    myfun (b); // error: no matching function call to do_it(B<int>&)

    return 0;
}

It must have something to do with the namespace of do_it. When I remove the namespace around it, it compiles.

Background: I am building a set of functions that may be used with many different container classes. To handle the different interfaces uniformly I use freestanding functions that are overloaded for each of the container classes. These functions shall be put into a namespace to avoid cluttering the global namespace with them.

The definitions for B shall be thought of as coming from a different header file than those for A so reordering is not an option.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-21T11:30:28+00:00Added an answer on May 21, 2026 at 11:30 am

    The reason is that only ADL is done at the point of the call. Other function lookups are only done in the definition of the myfun function template.

    And at that definition context, only the do_it overload accepting the A<int> is declared.

    Edit: If you want to have a Standard reference for this, refer to [temp.dep.candidate] and [temp.res]p1.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Why does this test program result in a java.lang.IllegalMonitorStateException ? public class test {
Why does this code: class A { public: explicit A(int x) {} }; class
Why does this code fail to display the category name Apples using the current
What does this mean exactly? I'm doing something like this: File.Copy(@\\foo\bar\baz.txt, @c:\test\baz.txt); MSDN doesn't
Why does this lambda expression not compile? Action a = () => throw new
Does this pattern: setTimeout(function(){ // do stuff }, 0); Actually return control to the
Why does this javascript return 108 instead of 2008? it gets the day and
What does this option do? It is accessible from the Build menu.
This is a self-explanatory question: Why does this thing bubble into my try catch's
The code currently does this and the fgetpos does handle files larger than 4GB

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.