Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8836937
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 14, 20262026-06-14T09:36:18+00:00 2026-06-14T09:36:18+00:00

Why doesn’t C have a ||= operator, or any other language for that matter?

  • 0

Why doesn’t C have a ||= operator, or any other language for that matter? Is there some technical reason, or is it for language aesthetics?

Edit Apparently Perl and Ruby have this, I didn’t know that when asking.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-14T09:36:19+00:00Added an answer on June 14, 2026 at 9:36 am

    In C this operator would be utterly nonsense. Think about the following example:

    char ind = 0;
    ind |= 1;
    ind |= 0;
    // ind is still 1
    

    This is doing exactly what ||= would achieve. For all types that are non-castable to bool this would be stupid anyways. Am I missing something?

    In all other programming languages without type inference this operator would only be valid for booleans.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

There doesn't seem to be a question for this, and it seems strange that
There doesn't seem to be any tried and true set of best practices to
There doesn't seem to be any mention of this on facebook's API. I found
Doesn't value have to return toString() to be able to call value.toString()? When do
Why doesn't this work? Some Usercontrol (name: myUserControl) with an image control (name: myImage):
There doesn't seem to be a clear documentation for what permissions are actually required
For some reason, after submitting a string like this Jack’s Spindle from a text
Doesn't produce a app.config . In my team there is a guy who has
Doesn't matter what I do, I simply can't get this to play a sound
There doesn't seem to be a way to access stack traces for a released

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.