Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8825545
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 14, 20262026-06-14T06:54:17+00:00 2026-06-14T06:54:17+00:00

Why doesn’t the following work in Firefox (v16)? var t = setTimeout(foo(), 1000); The

  • 0

Why doesn’t the following work in Firefox (v16)?

var t = setTimeout(foo(), 1000);

The error I get in the console is: “useless setTimeout call (missing quotes around argument?)”. Wrapping it in quotes doesn’t seem to do much, except making it render as a string (unsurprisingly).

It does however work fine when I wrap it in an anonymous function like so:

var t =
    setTimeout(function(){
       foo();
     }, 1000);

But why is it necessary? Why doesn’t it explode in Webkit or Opera? Stroke of luck?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-14T06:54:18+00:00Added an answer on June 14, 2026 at 6:54 am

    When you pass a method to setTimeout(), it will be executed in global scope. this will point to window at execution time. Read more HERE.

    If foo is not global, it won’t be found, ergo ReferenceError.

    var __nativeST__ = window.setTimeout, __nativeSI__ = window.setInterval;
    // just backed up the defaults. Now basically creating timeout and setInterval
    //functions that take scope as a parameter,
    //so you can use them in whichever invocation context you want.
    
    window.setTimeout = function (vCallback, nDelay /*, argumentToPass1, argumentToPass2, etc. */) {
      var oThis = this, aArgs = Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments, 2);
      return __nativeST__(vCallback instanceof Function ? function () {
        vCallback.apply(oThis, aArgs);
      } : vCallback, nDelay);
    };
    
    window.setInterval = function (vCallback, nDelay /*, argumentToPass1, argumentToPass2, etc. */) {
      var oThis = this, aArgs = Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments, 2);
      return __nativeSI__(vCallback instanceof Function ? function () {
        vCallback.apply(oThis, aArgs);
      } : vCallback, nDelay);
    };
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Why doesn't the following transition work in Firefox without the units? Once you add
This doesn't work: int number = 1; String numberstring = IntToString(number); I get The
Why doesn't this code work? b if b = true Error: undefined local variable
Why doesn't the following work? It appears that the literal zero at the end
Doesn't work: var b:ByteArray = new ByteArray(); b.writeFloat(-50.000000); b.position = 0; cpp.processFloat(b,b.bytesAvailable); CPP: static
Doesn't value have to return toString() to be able to call value.toString()? When do
Doesn't seem to work for me, maybe I just doing it wrong
Doesn't the space occupied by a variable get deallocated as soon as the control
Why doesn't this work? Some Usercontrol (name: myUserControl) with an image control (name: myImage):
Why doesn't this test case work? <?php // cards with cyrillic inidices and suits

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.