Question

Why I need to load the class definition like :

Class.forName(“ClassName”);

What is the need and advantage of this .Typically which is used to load driver class in JDBC.

Answer 1

What is the need and advantage of this. Typically which is used to load driver class in JDBC.

It allows you to build your applications so that key external dependencies are not compiled into the application source-code.

For example, in the JDBC case, it allows you to switch between different driver implementations, and (in theory) different database vendors without changing your source code.

Another use-case is when some supplier develops a generic form of an application with extension points that allow customers to “plug in” their own custom classes. The custom classes are typically loaded using Class.forName(...).

A third use-case is application frameworks and containers which typically use Class.forName(...) under the hood to dynamically load the classes for application-specific beans, servlets, and so on.

A fourth use-case is where the application (or more likely an application library) has modules that are not used in a typical application run. By using Class.forName(...) internally, the application or library can avoid the CPU and memory overhead of loading and initializing large numbers of unwanted classes. (The Sun Swing libraries apparently do this to reduce application startup times, and I’m sure there are other examples.)

However, if you don’t need to be able to do this kind of thing, static dependencies are simpler to implement.

FOLLOWUP

But here ,while compile itself the “ClassName” parameter is known .So the key external dependency is compiled into application source-code??

Nope. Obviously, that defeats the purpose. The application (or the framework) typically determines the names of the classes to be dynamically loaded from some configuration file.