Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6674601
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T03:45:54+00:00 2026-05-26T03:45:54+00:00

Why is it that when running code from gdb, I get the same addresses

  • 0

Why is it that when running code from gdb, I get the same addresses for the variables declared, but while just executing the binary I don’t get the same addresses.

#include<stdio.h>
void main()
{
    int *x,q;
    //I saw the address of the variable q in this program through gdb during the __1st__ execution.
    //I re-compiled the program to make x to point to this address.
    x=0x7fffffffe2bc; 
    *x=3;
    printf("%d",(*x));
}

I ran the program through gdb and it never Segfaulted.

$ gdb -q ./a.out  
Reading symbols from /home/eknath/needed2/a.out...done.  
(gdb) r  
Starting program: /home/eknath/needed2/a.out   
3
Program exited normally.  
(gdb) q  
$

But normal execution of the program always produces a SEGFAULT.

$ ./a.out   
Segmentation fault

I don’t know if this question is a duplicate of Is this always the address for GDB debug program?

NOTE: I have not switched off ASLR

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T03:45:54+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 3:45 am

    The reason you always get the same address for local variables while running under GDB is that GDB (in order to simplify most debugging scenarios) disables address space randomization.

    You can ask GDB to not do that with set disable-address-randomization off.

    For curious, disabling of address randomization for the current process does not require any privilege, and is done by calling personality(2). Here is the patch that added this feature.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there a tool that can generate sequence diagrams from running .NET code?
I have a thread in my application that is running code that can potentially
I'm running code that sometimes yields this: UInt32 current; int left, right; ... //sometimes
I am running simulation code that is largely bound by CPU speed. I am
I've got a code that lists the running application on a win32 box, and
I encountered a problem when running some old code that was handed down to
We have a system that has some Bash scripts running besides Java code. Since
I had a bunch of code in an activity that displays a running graph
I understand that using the === compares type, so running the following code results
I had code that worked fine when running in the context of the main

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.