Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4003618
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 20, 20262026-05-20T08:10:28+00:00 2026-05-20T08:10:28+00:00

Why is MyClass.allocate a public method in Ruby? Under what circumstances would you want

  • 0

Why is MyClass.allocate a public method in Ruby? Under what circumstances would you want to create an object but not run initialize on it?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-20T08:10:29+00:00Added an answer on May 20, 2026 at 8:10 am

    Deserialization comes to mind. A class may be serializable but might not have an initialize that takes no arguments, and that code shouldn’t need to initialize it to something just to immediately undo that work.

    Basically any scenario where you initialize an object differently then your typical case it becomes useful to separate those two steps.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

public class MyClass { public int Age; public int ID; } public void MyMethod()
I have the following structure public class MyClass : MyBaseClass<System.Int32> { } In a
I have a generic class public MyClass<TContext, T> where TContext : DataContext that effectively
Suppose I have a class public class MyClass { private Set<String> set = new
Given this definition: [UniqueId(Ident)] public class MyClass : MyBase { public int Ident{ get;
If I have a class org.foobar.MyClass and want to put it in a JAR
How is memory allocated when I use: public class MyClass { public const string
public class MyClass { int i = 0; string str = here; MyStruct mystruct;
I'm curious about the following code: class MyClass { public: MyClass() : _myArray(new int[1024])
class MyClass { public: ~MyClass() {} MyClass():x(0), y(0){} //default constructor MyClass(int X, int Y):x(X),

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.