Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8719475
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 13, 20262026-06-13T06:48:26+00:00 2026-06-13T06:48:26+00:00

Why is *(ptra + 0).prop not valid and (*(ptra + 0)).prop valid ? .

  • 0

Why is *(ptra + 0).prop not valid and (*(ptra + 0)).prop valid ? . I know that left side of the dot operator must have a structure. But I am still confused. Could someone explain to me the difference between the two ?

class myobj 
{
public:
    int v;
};

int main()
{

    myobj *ptra = new myobj[2]();

    *(ptra + 0).v = 12 //Error

    (*(ptra + 0)).v = 12 ; //OK

    return 0;

}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-13T06:48:28+00:00Added an answer on June 13, 2026 at 6:48 am

    Because operator . has a higher precedence then operator * , so

    *(ptra + 0).v
    

    means

    *((ptr + 0).v)
    

    and not

    (*(ptra + 0)).v
    

    *((ptr + 0).v) here is incorrect syntax, because (ptr + 0) is not a class or union, so has no any members.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a bunch of classes in a CUDA project that are mostly glorified
I have a data structure of the form below (V is Data.Storable.Vector): data Elems
I have written a library that exposes references to several related object types. All
I've got a vector of std::string that represents the structure of another vector of
I've got an API (a specific GUI library) that relies on std::shared_ptr a lot,
Suppose we have to use in some function deeply nested pointer very extensively: function
Is this a valid function pointer code below, In views , def change(request): dict={}
I am trying to create a map of addresses of objects that I create
I am trying to use std::shared_ptr in my code. I have seen there have
First of all - I apologize if this question shows ignorance or I'm not

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.