Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3983304
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 20, 20262026-05-20T05:37:54+00:00 2026-05-20T05:37:54+00:00

Why is the following C# not legal? Does there exist a proper workaround? public

  • 0

Why is the following C# not legal? Does there exist a proper workaround?

public class Base
{
    public Base(Func<double> func) { }
}

public class Derived : Base
{
    public Derived() : base(() => Method()) <-- compiler: Cannot access non-static method 'Method' in static context
    {
    }

    public double Method() { return 1.0; }
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-20T05:37:54+00:00Added an answer on May 20, 2026 at 5:37 am

    It’s effectively referring to “this” within the arguments to the base constructor, which you can’t do.

    If your delegate really doesn’t need access to this (which your sample doesn’t) you can just make it static. You could also use a method group conversion to make it simpler:

    public class Base
    {
        public Base(Func<double> func)
        {
            double result = func();
        }
    }
    
    public class Derived : Base
    {
        public Derived() : base(Method)
        {
        }
    
        public static double Method() { return 1.0; }
    }
    

    If you do need to use “this”, you could:

    • Make it a virtual method instead of calling a delegate
    • Make it a static method which takes an appropriate instance, e.g.

      public class Base
      {
          public Base(Func<Base, double> func)
          {
              double result = func(this);
          }
      }
      
      public class Derived : Base
      {
          public Derived() : base(x => Method(x))
          {
          }
      
          private static double Method(Base b) 
          {
              // The documentation would state that the method would only be called
              // from Base using "this" as the first argument
              Derived d = (Derived) b;
          }
      }
      
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

The following does not compile: class Foo { public: Foo( boost::shared_ptr< Bar > arg
class Base { public: virtual void myFunc(double a, double b) { }; virtual void
Is the following legal C++ code: class C { static public int x; };
Why does the following not work: #include <iostream> #include <fstream> #include <stack> std::stack<std::ifstream> s;
Why does the following not give an error? for (int i=0; i<10; ++i) //
The following does not work — handleSwipeUpTriple is never called: - (BOOL) application:(UIApplication *)application
I am not following how to initialize a class constructor which accepts the names
The following does not compile, and I cannot for the life of me see
The following class is not thread-safe (as proven in Proving the following code not
The following program will not compile: class Program { static void Main(string[] args) {

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.