Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 5986139
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 22, 20262026-05-22T22:37:49+00:00 2026-05-22T22:37:49+00:00

Why is the following LINQ syntax (sometimes called query syntax) called comprehension syntax? What’s

  • 0

Why is the following LINQ syntax (sometimes called “query” syntax) called “comprehension” syntax? What’s being comprehended (surely that’s wrong)? Or, what is comprehensively represented (maybe I’m on the right track, now)?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-22T22:37:50+00:00Added an answer on May 22, 2026 at 10:37 pm

    I suspect this is related to the second meaning of Comprehend:

    to take in or embrace; include;
    comprise

    This syntax has to do with defining what should be included in a set.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have the following query of linq to entities. The problem is that it
I have the following LINQ conditional where clause query that produces a result of
I need to translate the following LINQ query to Dynamic LINQ that accepts several
I have the following LINQ query that returns two objects from my database. These
Starting with the following LINQ query: from a in things where a.Id == b.Id
I have the following Linq to SQL query, in which I'm trying to do
I have a problem with the following Linq query using Entity Framework: from o
I have the following linq query: var files = (from d in new DirectoryInfo(@c:\program
How would the following sql query look when translated to linq? SELECT myId, Count(myId)
I am using LINQ to EF and have the following LINQ query: var results

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.