Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8910805
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 15, 20262026-06-15T03:46:55+00:00 2026-06-15T03:46:55+00:00

Why is the nested std::bind in the below code not implicitly converted to an

  • 0

Why is the nested std::bind in the below code not implicitly converted to an std::function<void()> by any of the major compilers (VS2010/2012, gcc, clang)? Is this standard behavior, or a bug?

#include <functional>

void bar(int, std::function<void()>) { }
void foo() { }

int main()
{
    std::function<void(int, std::function<void()>)> func;
    func = std::bind(bar, 5, std::bind(foo));

    std::cin.get();
    return 0;
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-15T03:46:56+00:00Added an answer on June 15, 2026 at 3:46 am

    This is explained in the boost documentation:

    The inner bind expressions are evaluated, in unspecified order, before
    the outer bind when the function object is called; the results of the
    evaluation are then substituted in their place when the outer bind is
    evaluated
    . In the example above, when the function object is called
    with the argument list (x), bind(g, _1)(x) is evaluated first,
    yielding g(x), and then bind(f, g(x))(x) is evaluated, yielding the
    final result f(g(x)).

    Boost even provides protect to prevent this evaluation:

    #include <boost/bind/protect.hpp>
    ...
    func = std::bind(bar, 5, boost::protect(std::bind(foo)));
    

    However, to call func you have to provide both arguments like this (thanks to David Rodríguez – dribeas for pointing that out), so this example is definitely not good:

    func(1, std::function<void()>());
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a problem when invoking nested std::bind expressions. The following code demonstrates the
How do I specialize a nested template? (See error below.) using std::reverse_iterator; template<typename It>
Nested layouts do not work in Rails 3. After I hit this I tried
Following code produces a nested array as a result for keys containing three items:
I was wondering if it was faster to have a std::vector<std::vector<double>> where the nested
I'm trying to extract some variables in my C++ code nested in blocks. For
I don't know if more information is needed than the code below, but if
std::pair has the nested typedefs first_type and second_type which give the type of the
I have a new function called removeInelligibleCharsFromTargetName . void removeInelligibleCharsFromTargetName(string *targetName) { for(int i
I have nested containers std::map<int, std::map<T, U> > and want to populate them properly,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.