Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8509723
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 11, 20262026-06-11T03:30:45+00:00 2026-06-11T03:30:45+00:00

Why is this not possible? I get the following compiler-error when instantiating DerivedClass with

  • 0

Why is this not possible?
I get the following compiler-error when instantiating “DerivedClass” with a constructor-parameter:

‘GenericParameterizedConstructor.DerivedClass’ does not contain a constructor that takes 1 argument

But calling a very similar method works.

Why?

class Program
{
    static void Main(string[] args)
    {
        // This one produces a compile error 
        // DerivedClass cls = new DerivedClass("Some value");

        // This one works;
        DerivedClass cls2 = new DerivedClass();
        cls2.SomeMethod("Some value");
    }
}


public class BaseClass<T>
{
    internal T Value;

    public BaseClass()
    {
    }

    public BaseClass(T value)
    {
        this.Value = value;
    }

    public void SomeMethod(T value)
    {
        this.Value = value;
    }
}

public class DerivedClass : BaseClass<String>
{
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-11T03:30:47+00:00Added an answer on June 11, 2026 at 3:30 am

    Constructors aren’t inherited – it’s as simple as that. DerivedClass contains a single constructor – the public parameterless constructor provided by default by the compiler, because you haven’t specified any constructors.

    Note that this has nothing to do with generics. You’d see the same thing if BaseClass weren’t generic.

    It’s easy to provide constructors for DerivedClass though:

    public class DerivedClass : BaseClass<String>
    {
        public DerivedClass() : base()
        {
        }
    
        public DerivedClass(string value) : base(value)
        {
        }
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm not sure if this is possible, is there a way to get the
I've read some articles on the Internet that this is not possible. To communicate
Reading the documentation it seems this might not be possible, but it seems that
Okay, I know that 1) this is probably not possible with CSS alone and
In the following code, why is not possible to do this dereferencing: *arr =
When I try to do that I get the following error: Changes to 64-bit
Go ahead and let me know if this is not possible: I need to
This may not be possible for the carousel but is there a way to
This is weird and probably not possible but I'll ask anyway. I'm making this
I fear this just may not be possible, but I'm trying to create a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.