Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Why must class members declared as const be initialized in the constructor initializer list rather than in the constructor body?
What is the difference between the two?
In C++, an object is considered fully initialised when execution enters the body of the constructor.
You said:
What you are missing is that initialisation happens in the initialisation list, and assignment happens in the body of the constructor. The steps in logic:
1) A const object can only be initialised.
2) An object has all of its members initialised in the initialisation list. Even if you do not explicitly initialise them there, the compiler will happily do so for you 🙂
3) Therefore, putting 1) and 2) together, a member which is const can only ever have a value assigned to it at initialisation, which happens during the initialisation list.