Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3309424
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T21:38:21+00:00 2026-05-17T21:38:21+00:00

Why ( P ^ Q ) === ( ~P -> Q ) ? How

  • 0

Why ( P ^ Q ) === ( ~P -> Q ) ?

How to prove?

Thanks!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T21:38:21+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 9:38 pm

    No, it’s not: ~P -> Q === P v Q, it is not equivalent to P ^ Q

    One way to prove it is to use a truth table:

    P | Q | P v Q | ~P | ~P -> Q
    0   0     0     1       0        
    0   1     1     1       1
    1   0     1     0       1
    1   1     1     1       1
              ^             ^
              +-------------+
           these are equivalent
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm thinking of an application that would try to prove the Six degrees of
From the wikipedia entry on NP-Complete: The easiest way to prove that some new
I was taught that a regression test was a small (only enough to prove
I apologize for asking such a generalized question, but it's something that can prove
I'm looking to write a html sanitiser, and obviously to test/prove that it works
I have been trying to use the Perl utility/module "prove" as a test harness
EDIT: Thanks Kenny and everyone else who answered similarly. It really was a DOH
I'm looking for a means to prove that the bicriteria shortest path problem is
What should be the ideal connection timeout in asp.net application? Does it prove to
I need someone to back me up, or prove me wrong, in regard to

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.