Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6756925
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T13:34:58+00:00 2026-05-26T13:34:58+00:00

Why the following code works: char *p; p=hello; printf(%s\n,p); While this one doesn’t: char

  • 0

Why the following code works:

char *p;

p="hello";

printf("%s\n",p);

While this one doesn’t:

char *p;

strcpy(p,"hello");

printf("%s\n",p);

I know that adding p=malloc(4); on the second example would make the code work, but that is exactly my question. Why malloc is needed in the second example but not in the first?

I looked for similar questions on SO but none answer this exactly.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T13:34:59+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 1:34 pm

    p is a pointer. You need to make it point to something. In the first case,

     p = "hello";
    

    makes p point to that string literal which is located somewhere in your program’s memory at runtime.

    In your second case, you didn’t make p point to anything, so doing anything that looks at where p points to is invalid.

    p = malloc(some_size);
    

    makes p point to a piece of (uninitialized) memory that can hold some_size chars. If you reserved enough, you can then do things like strcpy(p, "hello") because p does point to a valid memory area, so copying into the memory pointed-to by p is ok. Note that some_size must be at least as big as what you want to copy into it, including the '\0' string terminator.

    Note that doing:

    p = "hello";
    strcpy(p, "bye");
    

    would be invalid because "hello" can be stored as in a read-only memory, so you can’t overwrite it.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Look at the following code: int main(int argc, char* argv[]) { // This works:
The following code works for 90+ % of global security groups, but for one
Is the following code legal? char* randomMethod1() { char* ret = "hello"; return ret;
The following code works fine, but why is this correct code? Why is the
OK. We know the following code cannot be compiled. char source[1024]; char dest[1024]; //
The following code works as intended: template <typename T> inline char* Utils::PushData(char* destination, T
Why does the following code in C work? const char* str = NULL; str
The following code works great in IE, but not in FF or Safari. I
The following code works fine: person = {:a=>:A, :b=>:B, :c=>:C} berson = {:a=>:A1, :b=>:B1,
The following code works as expected on CentOS and Ubuntu O/s but not on

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.