Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9253973
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 18, 20262026-06-18T11:21:06+00:00 2026-06-18T11:21:06+00:00

Will an IDisposable memory leak if you don’t use a using statement? And if

  • 0

Will an IDisposable memory leak if you don’t use a using statement?
And if so, can someone provide a memory leak example if its not much code?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-18T11:21:07+00:00Added an answer on June 18, 2026 at 11:21 am

    A correctly-written program which creates an instance of a type that implements IDisposable, and which is not specifically known to be capable of adequately cleaning up after itself when abandoned, must ensure that Dispose is called on that instance before abandoning it. Any program which fails to call Dispose on a type which is not specifically known to be fine without it is broken.

    Although it would be nice if automatic finalization could take care of everything, it’s a pretty crummy cleanup mechanism. It provides no guarantees with regard to sequencing, threading context, timeliness, or certainty of completion (when using deterministic cleanup, one can make reasonably certain that a program won’t appear to complete normally if cleanup fails; when using finalization, a program may appear to complete normally without even attempting to clean up an object).

    Microsoft may once have intended that every IDisposable class should be able to adequately clean up after itself if abandoned, but that is simply not practical. In many cases, for a class to attempt to clean up after itself if abandoned would add a massive amount of complexity, and would simply turn a broken program that would have obvious problems that are easy to track down, into a broken program that usually works except when the timing of the finalizer thread relative to some other thread causes things to fail in some unexpected and non-reproducible fashion.

    There are some types which, despite implementing IDisposable, are unconditionally safe to abandon, and there are some others which may be safely abandoned in certain circumstances. It is fine to abandon such types in situations where disposing them would be difficult (e.g. because references are held by multiple objects that are manipulated by various threads, and there’s no nice way by which any particular object can know it when it holds the last surviving reference), provided that one documents one’s reasons for believing that such action is safe and appropriate. Such behavior is not appropriate, however, in cases where one has accepted IDisposable objects of unknown lineage.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

'using' statement guaranteed that for the object will be called Dispose method. In this
It has been my understanding that the using statement in .NET calls an IDisposable
Will my windows-7, command prompt allow me to filter memory logcat messages for my
We are using the NoTrackingReleasePolicy on the Windsor container due to the memory leaks
Possible Duplicate: Proper use of the IDisposable interface I tried to find an actual
I have a class with IDisposable interface. Now I don't know what behavior should
I'm starting a web app that will be using asp.net membership services (with a
I want to know if IDisposable objects will dispose on session ending. I know,
My application has just leaked 1.5GB of memory. I guess since I don't have
I had this code from a previous question, but its not compiling: public interface

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.