Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 736453
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T07:36:23+00:00 2026-05-14T07:36:23+00:00

Will this work for testing whether a value at position index exists or not,

  • 0

Will this work for testing whether a value at position index exists or not, or is there a better way:

if(arrayName[index]==""){
     // do stuff
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T07:36:24+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 7:36 am

    Conceptually, arrays in JavaScript contain array.length elements, starting with array[0] up until array[array.length - 1]. An array element with index i is defined to be part of the array if i is between 0 and array.length - 1 inclusive. If i is not in this range it’s not in the array.

    So by concept, arrays are linear, starting with zero and going to a maximum, without any mechanism for having “gaps” inside that range where no entries exist. To find out if a value exists at a given position index (where index is 0 or a positive integer), you literally just use

    if (i >= 0 && i < array.length) {
      // it is in array
    }
    

    Now, under the hood, JavaScript engines almost certainly won’t allocate array space linearly and contiguously like this, as it wouldn’t make much sense in a dynamic language and it would be inefficient for certain code. They’re probably hash tables or some hybrid mixture of strategies, and undefined ranges of the array probably aren’t allocated their own memory. Nonetheless, JavaScript the language wants to present arrays of array.length n as having n members and they are named 0 to n – 1, and anything in this range is part of the array.

    What you probably want, however, is to know if a value in an array is actually something defined – that is, it’s not undefined. Maybe you even want to know if it’s defined and not null. It’s possible to add members to an array without ever setting their value: for example, if you add array values by increasing the array.length property, any new values will be undefined.

    To determine if a given value is something meaningful, or has been defined. That is, not undefined, or null:

    if (typeof array[index] !== 'undefined') {
    

    or

    if (typeof array[index] !== 'undefined' && array[index] !== null) {
    

    Interestingly, because of JavaScript’s comparison rules, my last example can be optimised down to this:

    if (array[index] != null) {
      // The == and != operators consider null equal to only null or undefined
    }  
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 418k
  • Answers 418k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer It might be that you are not specific enough in… May 15, 2026 at 9:51 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer With the help of Spring SimpleNamingContextBuilder and Apache BasicDataSource, you… May 15, 2026 at 9:51 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer See this question. The standard guarantees that a temporary lives… May 15, 2026 at 9:51 am

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.