Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 174925
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T13:36:33+00:00 2026-05-11T13:36:33+00:00

With a JavaScript Array, I can reset it to an empty state with a

  • 0

With a JavaScript Array, I can reset it to an empty state with a single assignment:

array.length = 0; 

This makes the Array ‘appear’ empty and ready to reuse, and as far as I understand is a single ‘operation’ – that is, constant time.

Is there a similar way to clear a JS Object? I know I can iterate its fields deleting them:

for (var prop in obj) { if (obj.hasOwnProperty(prop)) { delete obj[prop]; } } 

but this has linear complexity.

I can also just throw the object away and create a new one:

obj = {}; 

But ‘promiscuous’ creation of new objects leads to problems with Garbage Collection on IE6. (As described here)

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T13:36:33+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 1:36 pm

    The short answer to your question, I think, is no (you can just create a new object).

    1. In this example, I believe setting the length to 0 still leaves all of the elements for garbage collection.

    2. You could add this to Object.prototype if it’s something you’d frequently use. Yes it’s linear in complexity, but anything that doesn’t do garbage collection later will be.

    3. This is the best solution. I know it’s not related to your question – but for how long do we need to continue supporting IE6? There are many campaigns to discontinue the usage of it.

    Feel free to correct me if there’s anything incorrect above.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 113k
  • Answers 113k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Javascript doesn't have a way to do true socket communications.… May 11, 2026 at 10:04 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer All IDE:s for Oracle DB are more or less bad,… May 11, 2026 at 10:04 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer On JAX-RS you must annotate a Request parameter with @Context:… May 11, 2026 at 10:03 pm

Related Questions

It sounds a lot more complicated than it really is. So in Perl, you
I've the following XML output from an asp.net webservice: <ArrayOfArrayOfString> <ArrayOfString> <string>1710</string> <string>1711</string> <string>1712</string>
I have been playing with javascript arrays and I have run into, what I
Let me start with a specific example of what I'm trying to do. I

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.