Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8220569
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 7, 20262026-06-07T13:34:01+00:00 2026-06-07T13:34:01+00:00

With an expression that returns an Either[Fail, TupleX], how do I fold over the

  • 0

With an expression that returns an Either[Fail, TupleX], how do I fold over the result without having to define local vals in the success block?

// returns Either[Fail, Tuple2[String, String]]
val result = for{
  model <- bindForm(form).right
  key   <- dao.storeKey(model.email, model.password)
} yield (model.email, key)

result fold (
  Conflict(_),
  tuple2 => { // want to define email/key on this line
    val(email,key) = tuple2
    ...
  }
)
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-07T13:34:03+00:00Added an answer on June 7, 2026 at 1:34 pm

    Like this

    result fold (Conflict(_), { case (email, key) => ... })
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Let's imagine that I have a result of evaluating XPath expression //node/@*. MSXML6 returns
Need to an expression that returns only things with an I followed by either
Trying to put a regex expression together that returns the string between _ and
Can anyone please suggest an XPath expression format that returns a string value containing
I've already read that the if statement in scala always returns an expression So
I'd like a JavaScript regular expression that can match a string either at the
I need an xpath expression that would return the value of I need to
I'd like to create a regular expression that will match and return based on
I have the following expression that should match the entire given word in case
I need a regular expression that will not allow multiple special characters in a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.