Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 370707
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T14:02:38+00:00 2026-05-12T14:02:38+00:00

With Bison, I figured out how to get everything into one long string as

  • 0

With Bison, I figured out how to get everything into one long string as follows:

arg_list:
    WORD arg_list { strcat( $1, "IFS" ); $$ = strcat($1, $2); }  |
    WORD
    ;

and:

WORD arg_list { printf("%s, %s\n", $1, $2); }

But the problem is that I will then have to split up $2 in the second rule again to parse it. Is there a way to populate an array instead of just using concatenation? Am I going about this the wrong way?

If I need to build something like a linked list that could make sense, just not sure what would be the proper way to bind to arg_list, and then clean up the memory.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T14:02:38+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 2:02 pm

    If you have an array type with a push_front operation, this is trivially:

    arg_list:
        WORD arg_list { $$ = $2.push_front($1); }
        WORD { $$ = new Array<string>($1); }
    

    without that, it requires more work. You can use a vector and add the strings on the end (which will be in the reversed order). Or you can use a linked list (which is easier if you’re using straight C):

    arg_list:
        WORD arg_list { $$ = malloc(sizeof(struct list_elem));
                        $$->next = $2;
                        $$->val = $1; }
        WORD          { $$ = malloc(sizeof(struct list_elem));
                        $$->next = 0;
                        $$->val = $1; }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.