Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 870165
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T10:25:33+00:00 2026-05-15T10:25:33+00:00

With Boost’s accumulators I can easily calculate statistical quantities for weighted or unweighted input

  • 0

With Boost’s accumulators I can easily calculate statistical quantities for
weighted or unweighted input sets. I wonder if it is possible to mix weighted
and unweighted quantities inside the same accumulator. Looking at the
docs it doesn’t seem that way.

This compiles fine but produces another result than I would have liked:

using namespace boost::accumulators;

const double a[] = {1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 2};
const double w[] = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9};

accumulator_set<double, features<tag::sum, tag::weighted_sum>, double> stats;
for (size_t i=0; i<9; ++i)
  stats(a[i], weight = w[i]);

std::cout << sum(stats) <<" "<< weighted_sum(stats) << std::endl;
// outputs "75 75" instead of "13 75"

Also, with a third template parameter to accumulator_set I always seems to
get weighted quantities, even when using an “unweighted” feature and extractor:

accumulator_set<double, features<tag::sum>, double> stats;
for (size_t i=0; i<9; ++i)
  stats(a[i], weight = w[i]);
std::cout << sum(stats) << std::endl;
// outputs "75" instead of 13

Do I always have to use two different accumulators if I want to calculate both
weighted and unweighted quantities?

EDIT
I just use sum as an example, in reality I am interested in multiple, more complicated quantities.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T10:25:33+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 10:25 am

    It does say in the documentation that

    When you specify a weight, all the
    accumulators in the set are replaced
    with their weighted equivalents.

    There are probably better ways to do it but you can try something like this (basically swapping the meaning of the value with that of the weight):

    accumulator_set< double, stats< tag::sum, tag::sum_of_weights >, double > acc;
    const double a[] = {1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 2};
    const double w[] = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9};
    
       for( int i = 0; i < sizeof( a ) / sizeof( a[ 0 ] ); i++ )
          acc( w[ i ], weight = a[ i ] );
    
       std::cout << extract_result< tag::sum >( acc ) << std::endl; // weighted sum, prints 75
       std::cout << extract_result< tag::sum_of_weights >( acc ) << std::endl; // sum, prints 13
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.