Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4614162
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 22, 20262026-05-22T01:39:31+00:00 2026-05-22T01:39:31+00:00

With dictionary I mean an array of key / value pairs with unique keys.

  • 0

With “dictionary” I mean an array of key / value pairs with unique keys. If not, why? If long enough, you can use the key as an input and the value as an output and it could have the solution to as many problems as you wish. It could “compute” anything as long as it’s long enough to hold every possible input. Which wouldn’t need be infinite as long as is established that the input will have a certain amount of bits. So if we agree that the input will be X bits, then you will only need a dictionary with 2^X items and you have every possible turing machine that will take X bits as an input.

Right? Well I guess I’m not but why?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-22T01:39:31+00:00Added an answer on May 22, 2026 at 1:39 am

    A simple Turing machine can add two integers– any two integers. A finite dictionary cannot.

    EDIT:
    (I’m editing my answer because soandos made a point too good to answer in a cramped comment box.)

    Good Question! Suppose we have an infinite dictionary, listing {key, value} pairs where the keys are all possible combinations of Turing machines and their finite inputs (or equivalently, all possible finite input sequences to a universal Turing machine), in order of increasing size. The values are the corresponding final states, with a leading bit to indicate [HALTS, DOES NOT HALT]. I argue that this is Turing-complete. (The act of looking up an entry is trivially simple and I don’t think we have to argue about it).

    The unsolvability of the Halting Problem has an equivalent in JSoldi’s Dictionary: if we want to be able to look up the [HALT, DOES NOT HALT] bit of any entry below a certain size, we need only a finite part of the dictionary. But to implement that much of the dictionary as a Turing machine, we would need a machine larger than that limiting size– it’s entry would not be in that portion of the dictionary. For any size of machine there is a machine that can answer the Halting Question for all machines of that size– but that machine is bigger, so it can’t answer the question about itself. Likewise any finite volume of the dictionary is completely repeated in an entry somewhere (in fact, infinitely many entries), but that entry is not in that volume.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I often use Dictionary in C#2.0 with the first key as string that was
can i add one dictionary object to another dictionary. I mean i am having
I'm hoping to call a static dictionary function using call(). By static I mean
I have a dictionary of 200,000 items (the keys are strings and the values
I have a dictionary that I normally access with a key, so I need
I have a dictionary where keys are strings, and values are integers. stats =
What would be the best way to create an array that can have an
I mean why cant we put key of dict as dict? that means we
Not long ago I posted a question about a design decision of my F1
I have a Dictionary of Dictionarys of Array of Objects. Just like this: A

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.