Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6813851
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T20:37:06+00:00 2026-05-26T20:37:06+00:00

With ECMAScript 5 we have Object.defineProperty , which allows us to describe how a

  • 0

With ECMAScript 5 we have Object.defineProperty, which allows us to describe how a property should respond to some actions. One of the possibilites from this is to disable enumeration of properties, so they won’t show up in for...in loops. For example the length property of arrays is not enumerable.

Is it possible to do something similar without ECMAScript 5?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T20:37:06+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 8:37 pm

    It’s not possibel to create non-enumerable properties in ECMA-262 ed 3, but you can emulate private members.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Google is failing me on this one. Let's say I have some ECMA script
From http://www.jibbering.com/faq/faq_notes/closures.html : Note: ECMAScript defines an internal [[prototype]] property of the internal Object
I have some code that retrieves a scripted svg image from a server via
Suppose I have a Javascript object which is initialized var letters = {q:0, t:0,
I have been playing around with Object.create in the EcmaScript 5 spec, and I
I have an svg group which contains some elements, I want to clone the
Have you tried using straight javascript (rather straight ECMAscript 3 standard) in Flex applications,
I'm working on some ECMAScript/JavaScript for an SVG file and need to get the
I have a list in SharePoint 2010 with some columns. All are default types.
I've been working on my own implementation of ECMAScript for quite some time now.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.