Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6836745
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T23:23:34+00:00 2026-05-26T23:23:34+00:00

With Git , I know you can specify only to selectively fetch a few

  • 0

With Git, I know you can specify only to selectively fetch a few branches from others. But if your tree is a remote to others, how do you prevent some branches from being fetched by others? Like just hiding a few.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T23:23:35+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 11:23 pm

    With Git itself, you can’t.
    Even with an authorization layer like Gitolite, you cannot restrict read access to branches.

    That means the general principle behind DVCS (Distributed VCS) repo holds true:
    If you have somehow access to a repo, you have read access to all its content.

    Keeping the confidential content in a separate repo remains the surest way to have that content never fetched, as mentioned in “Is there a good way to restrict read (fetch) on per branch basis in git?“

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a git repository with multiple branches. How can I know which branches
I know I can access android source code from https://android.googlesource.com , but it's hard
I know how to make a new branch that tracks remote branches, but how
I am still trying to move from git towards git-flow. I know I can
I know you can track a svn repo with git by using git svn
I know I can do most of this by hacking Trac and using Git
Assuming that I know there is a git-daemon running at git://git.mycompany.com , how can
How can you get the CVS repo of MMIX to CVS/Git? I know how
I'm using git gui and I can't see my branch. I know I checked
I know of some people who use git pull --rebase by default and others

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.