Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 90147
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T22:49:40+00:00 2026-05-10T22:49:40+00:00

With LINQ to SQL most likely going to not get as much active development

  • 0

With LINQ to SQL most likely going to not get as much active development as Entity Framework do you think it’s best to switch to Entity Framework?

I’ve personally found EF to be very clunky and hard to use compared to LINQ to SQL which feels very natural.

EDIT: I recently posted an article on my blog about my feelings towards this potential decision…

ADO.NET v LINQ to SQL

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T22:49:40+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 10:49 pm

    IMO, not at the moment.

    It is clear (from recent announcements especially) that EF is in for some heavy revisions as the ‘thunderdome‘ scenario plays out between LINQ-to-SQL and EF. Whatever happens, EF (in a few years) will almost certainly look quite different to EF today. Or certainly ‘different enough’ ;-p

    As such, my view is: stick with simple. And simple is LINQ-to-SQL.

    I don’t see much benefit learning a notoriously complex system if I know it is going to change very soon.

    And I’m 100% with you on LINQ-to-SQL ;-p

    If I needed something more than LINQ-to-SQL right now, I’d look at NHibernate or maybe LLBLGen Pro.

    (edit – as an update, my position has softened a little bit, here and here – but I’m still using LINQ-to-SQL as my primary tool; also – LINQ-to-SQL isn’t quite dead yet ;-p).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 67k
  • Answers 67k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • added an answer The MSDN docs for Environment.Version say this: Gets a Version… May 11, 2026 at 11:48 am
  • added an answer As you've said, it just calls the other constructor as… May 11, 2026 at 11:48 am
  • added an answer Not sure if I understand this correctly. List<List<int>> table =… May 11, 2026 at 11:48 am

Related Questions

With LINQ to SQL most likely going to not get as much active development
With LINQ to SQL in a ASP.NET MVC website I can display objects (records)
What's wrong with Linq to SQL? Or - what about Linq to SQL would
Just getting started with Linq to SQL so forgive the newbie question. I'm trying
I am working with LINQ to SQL and my image fields are treated as
I am attempting to experiment with linq to sql using this site as a
I have been having some issues with LINQ-To-SQL around memory usage. I'm using it
How do you perform a CROSS JOIN with LINQ to SQL?
I'm encountering some peculiarities with LINQ to SQL. With a relatively simple query, I
One of my chief annoyances with Linq to SQL in WinForms (and I daresay

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.