Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6224271
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T08:38:35+00:00 2026-05-24T08:38:35+00:00

With the code: template <typename T> class MyClass { public: MyClass(const MyClass& other) {

  • 0

With the code:

template <typename T>
class MyClass
{
    public:

        MyClass(const MyClass& other)
        {
            //Explicit, types must both match;
        }    

        template <typename U>
        MyClass(const MyClass<U>& other)
        {
            //Implicit, types can copy across if assignable.
            //<?> Is there a way to make this automatically happen for memberwise
            //copying without having to define the contents of this function?

            this->value = other.getValue();
        }

    privte:

        T value;
};

The following cases would be true:

MyClass<float> a;

MyClass<float> b = a; //Calls explicit constructor which would have been auto-generated.

MyClass<int> c;

MyClass<float> d = c; //Calls implicit constructor which would not have been auto gen.

My question is: is there a way to get an implicit copy constructor like this, but not have to define how it works? Copy, assignment, and standard constructors are all provided when a class is created by default… it would be nice to be able to get an implicit conversion constructor as well for free if possible when using templates.

I’m guessing its not possible but can someone explain why that is to me if that is the case?

Thanks!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T08:38:35+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 8:38 am

    You can’t make the compiler generate a pseudo-copy-constructor-template for you. Why? Because MyClass<T> can be something entirely different from MyClass<U>

    This isn’t my original answer. I had misunderstood the question, sorry

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Consider the following class: class MyClass { public: template<class T> typename T::result_type apply(T& func)
Consider the following code: class MyClass { template <typename Datatype> friend MyClass& operator<<(MyClass& MyClassReference,
In some code, I saw singleton template template<typename T> class Singleton { public: Singleton(T&
Here is my code: template<typename T1, typename T2> class MyClass { public: template<int num>
The following code template<typename T, typename U> class Alpha { public: template<typename V> void
Consider this code: template <typename T> class String { public: ... String(T* initStr) {
The offending code: template<typename T> class SharedObject { public: typedef boost::intrusive_ptr<T> Pointer; typedef boost::intrusive_ptr<T
Given the following piece of code: template<typename T> class MyContainer { typedef T value_type;
I have the following code: class TimeOutException {}; template <typename T> class MultiThreadedBuffer {
The following code #include <stdio.h> template <typename T, T v> class Tem { T

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.