With the framework that Visual Studio 2008 has, am I missing anything great by NOT using an external tool like NUnit? From what I can tell it seems like using NUnit would be more of a hassle with manually creating test classes and methods versus the right clicking native to the IDE. That being said, am I missing features that NUnit provides that VS doesn’t contain? Having a simple GUI for my QA people to access is fine and all, but using nAnt and the build dependencies on unit tests passing, am I missing cool features?
Share
Roy Osherove just wrote a recent blog post summarizing the differences between NUnit and MSTest. I think it answers your question.
He concludes that NUnit wins for Unit Testing, but MsTest has much better abilities for integration based testing and team testing with Team System.