Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8017511
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 4, 20262026-06-04T20:51:58+00:00 2026-06-04T20:51:58+00:00

Wondered if I could get your thoughts on what I should do in this

  • 0

Wondered if I could get your thoughts on what I should do in this scenario.

Assume I have between 4 to 8 threads and I have a vector of values which will never be written to, only read by the threads.

I have the option of creating a copy of the vector for each thread and then no thread locking between the threads, trying to access a shared copy. Or, I could lock one copy of the vector and make all threads access that.

What is the latency of a thread lock, in comparison to copying the vector? How big would the vector have to be, to make the overhead of the lock faster than copying the vector?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-04T20:51:59+00:00Added an answer on June 4, 2026 at 8:51 pm

    If no thread ever writes to it, you can safely share it without any lock or copy. Data races can only occur if there are write accesses involved.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Reading existing code at work, I wondered how come this could work. I have
I've always wondered how I could get away with this: int main(int argc, char
I wondered if anyone could shed some light on the way in which layers
I'm having the following problem and wondered whether anyone could see why this is
This question could be a can of worms, but I've always wondered if it
Wondered if someone could help me write a MySQL query. I noticed in my
I got bored earlier and wondered if you could execute terminal commands on the
I am fairly new to OOP and wondered if you could provide some help
I'm learning about composite UIs at the moment and I wondered if anyone could
I wondered if Java7's new invokedynamic bytecode instruction could be used to implement multiple

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.