Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 122291
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T04:06:20+00:00 2026-05-11T04:06:20+00:00

Working on a tracking application using GPS. It is all fine, but sometimes because

  • 0

Working on a tracking application using GPS. It is all fine, but sometimes because of the closed areas or bad weather I get inaccurate points. When you plot them, it just doesn’t look right, with lots of hops/jumps.

What algorithm should I run to filter out the bad signals It looks like an application of a blurring algorithm to me, but what do you think?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T04:06:21+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 4:06 am

    There are a few options:

    1. Throw out the outliers
    2. Filter
    3. Use a better GPS
    4. Use an external data source (snap to road)
    5. Combination of the above

    I like to use filters – A Kalman filter is the typical (and often best) solution – it uses an amount of predictive averaging which is better than a cheap IIR (Infinite Impulse Response) filter:

    FilteredValue = FilteredValue * 0.75 + NewValue * 0.25

    You can get GPS modules which give you 4-5 fixes per second, which will allow you to use the above ‘cheap’ filter with reasonable response times.

    You can also simply get a better GPS (SiRF III or better) that isn’t as noisy and has better indoor reception (where possible).

    Consumer GPS units ‘snap to road’ where possible, so errors off the road are not seen by the consumer, as well as a few of the other techniques.

    A Kalman isn’t easy to implement, but without an external dataset or sensor (such as road speed), it’s the best option. Check out http://www.google.com/search?q=open%20source%20kalman%20filter for code and tutorials on it.

    -Adam

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.