Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 660313
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T23:08:31+00:00 2026-05-13T23:08:31+00:00

Would it be OK to put my public interfaces into their own package (for

  • 0

Would it be OK to put my public interfaces into their own package (for my organisation only).

for example

com.example.myprogram - contains all normal code

com.example.myprogram.public - contains public accessible interfaces

com.example.myprogram.abstract - contains abstract classes

Is this a good or a bad thing to do, are there any disadvantages?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T23:08:32+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 11:08 pm

    I wouldn’t like this practice at all. You should group classes, both abstract and concrete, and interfaces according to functionality.

    Look at the Java API as an example. Did Sun separate the Collections interfaces from implementations? No. Sun’s practices aren’t always the best guide, but in this case I agree.

    Don’t do it.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I would like to put my local OS X wordpress site in my ~users/Sites/public
I'm kind of confused. I would put all the HTML for the menu in
Where would you put global constants in a C++ application? For example would you
how would i put the contents of a webpage into a string? it would
If I want a whole page to reload every N seconds, I would put
I want to declare some global variables and global constants. Normally, I would put
While editing .scm files it would be great if Vim would automatically put the
Using highcharts, how would I put a default grey bar under my column charts,
Here's the thing. I have an interface, and I would to put the Include
How do I add my own todo and comments list to appear on Interfaces?

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.