Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 5977577
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 22, 20262026-05-22T21:23:26+00:00 2026-05-22T21:23:26+00:00

Would you recommend doing any grouping of test cases within @Test methods, or have

  • 0

Would you recommend doing any grouping of test cases within @Test methods, or have one @Test method per test scenario? For example, let’s suppose that there are different ways to set the context in an application.

Is the following idea acceptable?

@Test
public void testContextSetting() {
    // Test default setting
    assert(...)

    // Test setting a context variable
    assert(...)

    ...
}

Or, would you rather suggest having it like this, having each method as atomic as possible:

@Test
public void textDefaultSetting() {
    // Test default setting
    assert(...)
}

@Test
public void testSettingContextVar() {
    // Test setting a context variable
    assert(...)

    ...
}

Any feedback would be appreciated.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-22T21:23:28+00:00Added an answer on May 22, 2026 at 9:23 pm

    I prefer having one test case per method.

    First it is easier to see what cases are being tested if they are split into methods as opposed to looking for comments embedded in the code. Most IDEs will give you a summary of methods, so instead of saying “did I test edgecase XYZ?” and then hunting for a comment, or looking for the code that sets up that edgecase, you just look for the method named setupContextEdgeCaseXYZ().

    A second reason is if you have multiple cases together one may fail and then the others never execute.

     testDefaultCase()
     testInvalidInput()
     testEdgeCase1()
     testEdgeCase2()
    

    With this structure it would be easier to determine that the input checking is bad and edge case 2 is handled improperly, but the others are OK (and you may find out that two failing cases are related and the problem is diagnosed faster).

    A third reason is you may accidentally leave values from a previous test set that invalidates a latter test in a inconspicuous way. A simple example:

    @Test
    public void testMyMethod() {
      //test default
      String test = Foo.bar(null);
      assertEquals("foo", test);
    
      //test case 1
      Foo.bar(aValue);
      //Oops forgot to set value above, this passes regardless of 
      //what the above call does
      assertEquals("foo", test);
    }
    

    By breaking cases apart you can avoid mistakes as above as that would turn into a compile error or warning.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Are there any tools you would recommend for site architecture design and analysis? I've
Has someone experience with database comparison tools? Which one you would recommend? We are
So standard Agile philosophy would recommend making your domain classes simple POCOs which are
Which orm you would recommend for a beginner moving from ado.net?... Thus far used
Is there a guide/reference anyone would recommend to pick up C++ specifically if you
What are the basic minimum set of Code Analysis rules that you would recommend
Would you recommend me the best approach to edit SQL query with Visual Studio
Would you recommend using a datetime or a timestamp field, and why (using MySQL)?
What would you recommend for OS X development of a graphical application like those
What would you recommend to search a sql server table (varchar(max) column) for a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.