Would you write something like:
enum XYZ_TYPE {X=1, Y=2, Z=3};
I saw it and the suffix _TYPE confuses me in the enum context. There is a strong prospect that it is because I am not bright.
Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
There is nothing wrong with that suffix as enums are types of their own, they simply are not type safe.
C++0x fixes enums so they are strongly typed though.
Just follow whatever your coding standard says about enum type names. In the end it doesn’t matter as long as it is consistent with your coding standard, and it is logically sound.