Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6586543
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 25, 20262026-05-25T16:48:12+00:00 2026-05-25T16:48:12+00:00

Wow! I have just realized that varargs methods in Java cause an array to

  • 0

Wow! I have just realized that varargs methods in Java cause an array to be allocated when they are called. Not sure why I would expect anything different, but should there perhaps be some kind of pooling for the arrays? At least for the initial 0 to 8 sizes? Is there any workaround in Java to use varargs without causing an array allocation for every call?

EDIT: Please understand that leaking memory to the GC is just an unwanted overhead/latency. It is NOT a bug like some comments implied. Just because Java has GC does not mean you can create tons of garbage at will.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-25T16:48:12+00:00Added an answer on May 25, 2026 at 4:48 pm

    See the example of EnumSet. the vararg method

    of(E first, E... rest) 
    

    is overloaded with

    of(E e1, E e2) 
    of(E e1, E e2, E e3) 
    of(E e1, E e2, E e3, E e4) 
    of(E e1, E e2, E e3, E e4, E e5) 
    

    to avoid the vararg array creation if args are 5 or less. (EnumSet probably goes too far here)

    I don’t think this is really a GC concern. The array created is dereferenced very quickly, such die-young garbage should have almost no impact to GC.

    However, instantiating an array is a relatively expensive operation; since EnumSet.add() is very fast, the overhead of array creation can be quite noticeable; they probably did some benchmark, and decided it’s worthwhile to optimized with overloading for up to 5 args.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

It's really simple, I just want one screen. Wow, that [shiny thing] must have
WOW! That's a weird title, but I'm happy you're looking, cause I couldn't find
I have a DataGrid (called TheGrid) that I would like to implement copy and
I just enabled error reporting and wow what a shocker I have probably thousands
Wow, that title was a mouthful... I'm sure that sounds very confusing at first
I have a game server (WoW). I want my players to download my custom
Wow, I'm having a bit of a headache with Access 2007. I have two
Wow, I just got back a huge project in C# from outsourced developers and
Wow, switching to REST is a different paradigm for sure and is mainly a
I have a DB that contains a list of paths to files. I want

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.