Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 669325
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T00:08:20+00:00 2026-05-14T00:08:20+00:00

Yes I know that it shouldn’t be abused and that C# is primariy used

  • 0

Yes I know that it shouldn’t be abused and that C# is primariy used as a static language. But seriously folks if you could just dirty up some code, in the python style, or create some dynamic do hicky, would you?

My mind is working overtime on this having spent a while loving the dynamics of python, is c# going over to the dark side through the back door?

Is the argument for static typing a dead one with this obvious addition?

Is the argument for less Unit testing a bit silly when we are all grown ups?

Or has the addition of dynamics ruined a strongly static typed and well designed language?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 1 View
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T00:08:21+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 12:08 am

    I lost the desire to use dynamic types when I started using type inference.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Yes, I know that the FAQ pretends to answer this, but it doesn't really.
(Yes I know I can call Java code from Scala; but that is pointless;
Suppose the following Employee class (yes I know I shouldn't publicly expose Lists but
First, yes, I know that regex should never be used to parse HTML, however,
Yes, I know that downcast using dynamic_cast can't compile if the Base is not
Is it possible to know that a HTTP request is from Ajax?If yes, how?
Yes, I know, the archive bit is evil. That being said, is there support
Yes I know, this title isn't really helpfull but this is the exact problem.
I have the following code (Yes I know it's quite long winded, but I
I know that there is already a question (actually some more) about this, but

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.