Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 790723
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T21:43:32+00:00 2026-05-14T21:43:32+00:00

you have a class A, where you set ctor to be private, so a

  • 0

you have a class A, where you set ctor to be private, so a client can’t call
“A a;”
to create obj on stack.
But someday another developer add a new ctor:
“A(int)”
and try to call “A a(1);” inside main(). So this will create a obj on stack. How do you prevent that?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T21:43:33+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 9:43 pm

    Nothing you can do to C++ source code can constrain the future behavior of other people with permission to modify the C++ source code. That other developer could delete the string ‘private:’ just as easily as they could add a public constructor with another signature. All you can do is carefully comment the reasons why this class shouldn’t ever be allocated directly, and expect other developers to read and pay attention.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a snippet to create a 'Like' button for our news site: <iframe
Imagine you have a derived class, where the base class is something you cannot
Lets say I have a class like this: public class Foo { public Foo
My question is about memory use and objects in actionscript 2. If I have
Let say I have the following desire, to simplify the IConvertible's to allow me
I have a project that adds elements to an AutoCad drawing. I noticed that
I have a script that appends some rows to a table. One of the
I have a new web app that is packaged as a WAR as part
I have several USB mass storage flash drives connected to a Ubuntu Linux computer
I have found this example on StackOverflow: var people = new List<Person> { new

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.