Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 594101
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T15:55:02+00:00 2026-05-13T15:55:02+00:00

You know, the next big and enterprisey thing from Microsoft. Is it just me,

  • 0

You know, the next “big” and “enterprisey” thing from Microsoft.

Is it just me, or is it really hardly for humans? Main highlights are (IMO):

  • Absolutely cryptic syntax (-skip:objectName=filePath,absolutePath=App_Offline.* just for skipping App_Offline.html)
  • Manifest as an after thought
  • Lack of thorough documentation
  • Not a word about extensibility (except for several blog posts out there). Moreover, all these extensions developed in great pains have to be registered in GAC and registry
  • Waaay too low-level (metadata/metakey; all this IIS jazz)
  • No integration with MSBuild

Granted, MSDeploy and MSDeployAgent are quite powerful, but do they really need to be that complex for relatively simple tasks?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T15:55:03+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 3:55 pm

    I too share your frustrations over the lack of documentation and the apparent low-level nature of this tool.

    However what MS has done is finally create a free tool with which you can actually script whole server deployments, including parameterising addresses, configurations etc. This is unfortunately a very complicated thing to do – given how many bits of configuration actually go into a web server – and this is probably the best way to do it all.

    What we need now is a really good GUI that can help build up these packages, and scripts etc. The GUI that is embedded within IIS is good – but again, short on explanation – so hopefully soon that’ll be addressed.

    On the functional side, I’m using at the moment to deploy a site from dev -> staging -> live with parameters to change bound IP addresses etc. I was deeply frustrated that it took me a few days to get it all working – however now I have it, I can remove a lot of the possibly of human error at the IT Support side – who are responsible for our deployments. I now only have the configuration of my master staging server to worry about – and can be sure that all the servers in the web farm will be kept in sync whenever I deploy.

    As Sayed mentions, as well, there are MSBuild tasks in 2010 (the Website Deployment feature is now implemented using msdeploy) to work with this – which also brings the possibility of a true Continuous Integration environment to VSTeamSystem – having a team build that can actually perform a full web deployment as its last step is very exciting (and scary, granted!).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I know this sounds confusing: I have just built some basic prev/next pagination for
I don't really know how to deal with the next issue : So, I've
Several years ago, the 'next big thing' was clockless computers. The idea behind it
I want to insert data into a table where I don't know the next
Does anyone know what's going to be in the next version of jquery (1.3.3
Does anyone know if views states (used in Silverlight) will be available in next
How can I select the next node after an defined comment? I know the
My name is Dennis and I am pretty ambitious of creating the next big
I have the next problem: I have a big object graph being binary serialized
I have a method where performance is really important (I know premature optimization is

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.