Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9139641
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 17, 20262026-06-17T09:24:50+00:00 2026-06-17T09:24:50+00:00

1) utility class, use only static methods, block copying and creation class myUtils {

  • 0

1) utility class, use only static methods, block copying and creation

class myUtils
{
public:
    static void utilFunc();
    static void utilGreatFunc();

private:
    utils() { } // block creation
    utils(const utils &) { }
    ~utils() { }
}

2) use namespace

namespace myUtils 
{
    void utilFunc();
    void utilGreatFunc();
}

what is the best way of doing this? I suppose the namespace way, it is much clearer to me and simpler to write. Or maybe there is some other and better design?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-17T09:24:51+00:00Added an answer on June 17, 2026 at 9:24 am

    You never use a “utility class with static methods” in C++. That’s a Java-ism. Instead, use your second solution and put the functions in a namespace.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a small utility class : public static class SerializationUtilities { public static
I have the following utility: class Worker { public void DoWorkAsync(Action callback) { Action
I'm trying to build a utility class that I can re-use, that converts a
I have a utility class that creates & returns a db connection: Public Shared
I got a Utility module since VB.NET doesn't have static class like C# and
Lets I have a utility class called MathUtil. and it looks like this .
I have developed an utility class for spring which is a singleton which will
i write some utility class but how to get name ? Can that send
The following is a utility class that is called by a LoginBean to add
I'm developing a utility class to handle Actions from Java Swing components; I would

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.