Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9120543
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 17, 20262026-06-17T05:39:04+00:00 2026-06-17T05:39:04+00:00

[1=>0]+[2=>0] yields [1=>0,2=>0] . But is there any trick to use such syntax sugar

  • 0

[1=>0]+[2=>0] yields [1=>0,2=>0]. But is there any trick to use such syntax sugar for [1]+[2]. So [1]+[2] yeilds [1,2]?

note: My concern is about such syntax, not about other related PHP functions.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-17T05:39:05+00:00Added an answer on June 17, 2026 at 5:39 am

    This is because + is union operator. It does not append or merge.

    [1] is array(0=>1);
    [2] is array(0=>2);
    

    If you union it’ll become array(0=>1) as 0 key already exists in the first array.

    There is no syntactic sugar to do it. However, you can try this

    [1]+[1=>2]
    

    or in other ugly expression

    [1]+[count([1])=>2]
    

    Also syntactically [1]+[2] == [1,2] does not make sense at all. Thats python thing.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I doubt it can be done portably, but are there any solutions out there?
This yields proper results, but I would like to have the resulting row in
Suppose I have a list that I wish not to return but to yield
In Ruby I can use result << (yield element) and everything works, but if
The following code yields an error error: ‘struct Foo’ is not a valid type
There are lots of examples on this site about adding to NSMutableArray and I
I have seen this thread: WPF image resources and applied the information there. But
Searching for information about Flash/Flex + REST yields several many years old blog posts
If a DOC file is being opened by MS Word, is there any way
I want to use Java Mail to send an email but I want to

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.