Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6207969
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T05:43:38+00:00 2026-05-24T05:43:38+00:00

25% of programmers work time is spended by checking if the required code already

  • 0

25% of programmers work time is spended by checking if the required code already exist.

I’m searching for a base class for implementing the safe bool idiom.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T05:43:39+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 5:43 am

    bool_testable<> in Boost.Operators looks promising.

    The reference mentions that:

    bool_testable provides the antithesis of
    operator bool, such that the expression if (!p) is valid, whilst also
    making operator bool safer by preventing accidental conversions to
    integer types. … bool_testable<> prevents these accidental
    conversions by declaring a private conversion operator to signed char,
    and not defining the body.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

As programmers, we work with strings a lot. Most of the time, I use
I work at a smallish web agency (3 programmers, 2 project managers), we mostly
I work for a small website company (couple of programmers, couple of designers). Currently
In my work experience, most fresh out of school programmers are set right to
I am a C# programmer but I have to work with some VB.Net code
I can imagine system of how can multiple programmers work intensive on same codebase
I lead a team of six programmers, and we are presently implementing a number
I'm preparing a class on Visual Basic 2005 targeting Visual Basic 6 programmers migrating
Though 99% of the code on our site is the work of 1 programmer,
Is there arguments that work most of the time in AS3? I want a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.