Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 282985
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T05:20:06+00:00 2026-05-12T05:20:06+00:00

A) (Int32)X | ((Int32)Y << 16) ; B) (Int32)X + (Int32)Y * (Int32)Int16.MaxValue ;

  • 0

A) (Int32)X | ((Int32)Y << 16);

B) (Int32)X + (Int32)Y * (Int32)Int16.MaxValue;

Shouldn’t both be equivalent? I know from testing that the first works as expected, but for some reason the second doesn’t. Both X and Y are shorts (Int16), and the return type is an integer (Int32).

Shouldn’t Y << 16 <=> Y * Int16.MaxValue?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T05:20:07+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 5:20 am

    To get the desired behaviour, you need to multiply with 0x10000 (i.e. UInt16.MaxValue+1). Int16.MaxValue is 0x7fff.

    5 << 16
    327680
    
    5 * 0x10000
    327680
    

    Compare to the decimal system: If you want to “shift” the number 5 to 500, you need to multiply with 100, not 99 🙂

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

What's the first version of Delphi that has Int8 , Int16 , Int32 ,
The following code works fine in C#. Int32 a, b; Int16 c; a =
An int ( Int32 ) has a memory footprint of 4 bytes. But what
typeof(int).Name Will return System.Int32 does anyone know of a way to return int
In C#, int and Int32 are the same thing, but I've read a number
I think that this is not possible because Int32 has 1 bit sign and
Core Data has int16, int32, and int64. When working with these in their NSNumber
What is the difference between int , System.Int16 , System.Int32 and System.Int64 other than
I know there is a simple solution to this but can't seem to find
I have being studying (newbie) .NET and I got some doubts. Reading from a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.