Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3488682
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 18, 20262026-05-18T11:18:02+00:00 2026-05-18T11:18:02+00:00

According to OWASP Top 10 List one way to prevent insecure direct object references

  • 0

According to OWASP Top 10 List one way to prevent insecure direct object references is to provide only indirect references. These are artificial references that are mapped to the direct (e.g. DB) references on the server. The mapping is stored in the session.

Unfortunately, this solution is not very search engine friendly. The links stored by the crawler would be invalid in another session.

Is there a way around this problem? Are there other solutions apart from mapping references or checking object access?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-18T11:18:03+00:00Added an answer on May 18, 2026 at 11:18 am

    You are describing a problem that doesn’t exist 🙂

    Everything that a search engine must be able to crawl and see has to be public, because everything a search engine can see, can be seen by everybody. For data that is expected to be public -by definition- the object reference can never be insecure. Insecure means that it is supposed to be protected.

    So if you are questioning this, take a step back and look closely at your data. If it must be crawlable, why are you trying to protect it? If it should be protected, why are you supplying it to search engines.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

According to the MSDN documentation , transactional NTFS doesn't seem to allow one to
According to Firebug console, we have the following in JavaScript: >>> [''] == ''
According to PHP, locale information is maintained per process. Is my understanding correct that
According to Apple's website, the iPhone 4 is 960-by-640-pixel resolution at 326 ppi. I
According to MSDN, System.Int32 is immutable, and its members always return new instances. Some
According to a post at the very end of this thread you can replace
According to http://www.storytotell.org/blog/2008/11/14/literal-tables-and-updates-with-joins-in-sql.html the following is valid: SELECT * FROM VALUES ('Lisp', 50, true),
According to this SDK guide , unit-testing a Library project can be achieved by
According to Single-Threaded Application with Long-Running Calculation MSDN example, there is a possibility of
According to the information I could gather on .NET and Java execution environment, the

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.