Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 898513
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T15:03:19+00:00 2026-05-15T15:03:19+00:00

According to the documentation , List.contains can throw NullPointerException in this scenario: if the

  • 0

According to the documentation, List.contains can throw NullPointerException in this scenario:

“if the specified element is null and
this list does not support null
elements (optional).”

I was just trying to think of a List implementation that doesn’t allow nulls though, and I’m not aware of any. For example, I can have ArrayList<Double>, but it allows nulls.

    List<Double> list = new ArrayList<Double>();
    if (list.contains(null)) { // this won't throw NPE            
    }

So is the documentation here referring to custom implementations of this interface, or are there some native JAVA collection classes that extend List that don’t allow null elements? I realize the exception is optional, I was just trying to think of a real world case where this could occur.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T15:03:20+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 3:03 pm

    Not all implementations of List<…> allow for elements to be null.

    An example is RoleList::add(role) that throws an exception when adding a Null value.

    This documentation prepares you for such an encounter, encouraging you to check the documentation of whatever list you’re working with to see if it’s a concern, or to err on the side of caution if you are unable to check it. Tracking down NPE’s is not fun. Knowing documentation (provided good documentation exists) can save a lot of headaches.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

According to the MSDN documentation on the List<T>.Clear method : This method is an
According to the documentation, the decimal.Round method uses a round-to-even algorithm which is not
I'm using TinyXML to parse/build XML files. Now, according to the documentation this library
According to the feedparser documentation , I can turn an RSS feed into a
Update : This works in firefox, but does not work on chrome 6, still
According to the documentation a mutex can be initialized in two ways: Using the
I want to get an access_token according to this documentation http://dev.twitter.com/doc/post/oauth/request_token . I use
According to the documentation, they're pretty much interchangeable. Is there a stylistic reason to
According to the documentation, a prepared query provides a significant performance benefit if you're
According to the documentation of the == operator in MSDN , For predefined value

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.