Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7859687
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 2, 20262026-06-02T21:59:31+00:00 2026-06-02T21:59:31+00:00

According to ThreadLocal ‘s javadoc, it sounds like its a thread-specific container for 1+

  • 0

According to ThreadLocal‘s javadoc, it sounds like its a thread-specific container for 1+ atomic fields.

Is the purpose of ThreadLocal to represent all the atomic fields for a single Thread, or is it to just provided a convenience container when you have multiple Atomic* instances that need to be logically grouped together?

I guess I’m wondering why I would ever want to use a ThreadLocal instead of, say, an AtomicLong or AtomicInteger? Thanks in advance!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-02T21:59:32+00:00Added an answer on June 2, 2026 at 9:59 pm

    The purpose of ThreadLocal is that the fields do not have to be atomic — there is no need to synchronize their values with centralized memory. They are thread-local and only exist in the threads local memory storage.

    Why would I ever want to use a ThreadLocal instead of, say, an AtomicLong or AtomicInteger?

    ThreadLocal is very useful for storing a per-thread copy of something. For example a SimpleDateFormat which is unfortunately not reentrant.

    private final ThreadLocal<DateFormat> threadLocal =
            new ThreadLocal<DateFormat>() {
        @Override
        protected DateFormat initialValue() {
            return new SimpleDateFormat("yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss.SSSSSS");
        }
    };
    ...
    // get one that is per-thread
    DateFormat dateFormat = threadLocal.get();
    

    This is a useful pattern because then we don’t have to synchronize on it or worry about any volatile or other atomic operations that have memory barriers.

    One caveat is that ThreadLocal variables often are detected as memory leaks since they are only freed when the thread is reaped which can cause problems with web container class loaders.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

According to this reddit comment thread , it is undefined if an attempt is
According to the docs , all ajax pages fetched are removed from the DOM
According to MSDN : Parameters must be declared on public non-static fields or properties.
According to my class notes, you can allocate an array in C++ like int
According to the documentation i would like to overwrite predefined formats using this settings:
According to a book I have (Eclipse for Minor Geniuses or something like that),
According to progit book, $ git rm log/\*.log removes all *.log files in log
According to a post at the very end of this thread you can replace
According to this , ActiveRecord first generates the SQL: SELECT * FROM clients LIMIT
According to the example in the manual of 'Robot Framework', in order to provide

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.