Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7087951
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 28, 20262026-05-28T07:44:14+00:00 2026-05-28T07:44:14+00:00

Apparently, you can’t call apply with a record constructor: (defrecord Foo. [id field]) (apply

  • 0

Apparently, you can’t call apply with a record constructor:

(defrecord Foo. [id field])

(apply Foo. my-list)

fails at read time because it is not expecting Foo. in that place.

The only obvious workaround I could think of was to add a factory function:

(make-foo [id field] (Foo. id field))

which can be apply’ed of course.

Am I missing anything? I’d expect this from C#/Java but just thought it was a bit disappointing in Clojure…

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-28T07:44:15+00:00Added an answer on May 28, 2026 at 7:44 am

    Circling back on this post-1.3….

    In Clojure 1.3, defrecord creates two generated constructor functions. Given:

    (defrecord Person [first last]) 
    

    this will create a positional constructor function ->Person:

    (->Person "alex" "miller")
    

    and a map constructor function map->Person:

    (map->Person {:first "string"})
    

    Because this is a map, all keys are optional and take on a nil value in the constructed object.

    You should require/use these functions from the ns where you declare the record, but you do not need to import the record class as you would when using the Java class constructor.

    More details:

    • http://dev.clojure.org/display/design/defrecord+improvements
    • http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/browse_thread/thread/ce22faf3657ca00a/beb75e61ae0d3f53
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Apparently I can't move files on different volumes using Directory.Move. I have read that
I'm learning xForms, but apparently not well enough because I can't figure out why
Apparently you can easily obtain a client IP address in WCF 3.5 but not
I always thought an SQL compiler would break but apparently nesing can nearly be
I've tried to find an answer to do this online but apparently it can't
When putting a favicon on your site, you can apparently use an animated gif,
apparently it works Can you name reasons beyond good practices not to give these
Since there is apparently no Flash control that can accept bitmap pastes , I
Apparently, they're confusing. Is that seriously the reason? Can you think of any others?
I'm apparently laboring under a poor understanding of Python scoping. Perhaps you can help.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.